Forward to list...


----- Forwarded Message ----
> From: Jack Challen 
> To: Pieren
> Sent: Monday, 23 March, 2009 23:06:24
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] (French/Legal) Legal clarification of using the 
> French Cadastral plans
> 
> Pieren wrote:
> > No, if you trace streets and take names from the cadastre, you also
> > have to write attribution.
> 
> Ok, I shall. The areas I'm working on are completely blank, save for my prior 
> work; I shall therefore add the "source=..." tag on all the new stuff I do 
> via 
> the plugin.
> 
> > The page you refere needs some cleanup. If
> > the street is already there and you take only the name, you should add
> > something like "source:name" tag.
> 
> I'll add the plain "source=..." -- although some initial location data is 
> GPS-derived, I'll probably take a lot of information (i.e. I'll take more 
> than 
> just the name) from the cadastre.
> Would it be of use if I were to create an English version of that page? I'm 
> not 
> sure, as I'm not that likely to keep it updated, and perhaps wrong 
> information 
> does more harm than no information.
> 
> 
> > It's maybe easier to just enable the
> > auto-trace from the menu.
> 
> My particular version (version 13785 (14003)) doesn't appear to have 
> auto-trace. 
> I might look into it.
> 
> > Sometimes the cadastre toponymy is outdated
> > or different from what is on the streets (hopefully it's rare). It's
> > not eastern eggs and the land registry do not care very much if you
> > just copy the names without attribution but it will help other
> > contributors who are going on the ground to understand why they might
> > see a different name or a different syntax from the street signs.
> 
> Fair enough.
> On two slightly-related notes:
> 
> 1) Is the cadastre _correct_, or is what's on the ground _correct_? (This 
> point 
> doesn't particularly matter to me: if I were to do the right thing I'd inform 
> the local land registry that e.g. signage disagrees with the cadastre.
> 
> 2) What do I do if I believe some of the cadastral data is out of date? The 
> scans for Glanges look... wrong, at least compared to what I've got.
> 
> 
> Anyway, thanks for your help, Sylvain and Pieren.
> 
> cheers
> jack



      

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to