marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote: > I completely agree here. > A polygon is a simpler, easier to evaluate, to tag and > much, much less error-prone way to do this compared to > a relation that has all ways in that area as members.
Inclusion tests (especially if even a way "segment" can be intersected by the area polygon) are easier for evaluation than direct membership references? I doubt that this is usually correct. Tobias Knerr _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
