--- On Thu, 2/7/09, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote:
> > This is a bad idea. Do it right or do it not.
>
> ... has never been OSM's attitude so far, so why change
> now. Honestly, I
Judging by my experience, there will be most likely be between 0.01% and 1%
IPv6 traffic v IPv4 traffic, this of course will depend entirely on the regions
most users are in. I don't see any issue in using a tunnel for this kind of
thing since the volume of traffic is usually so low.
> get the feeling you're on a personal crusade here for
I get that feeling too, I'm all for IPv6 adoption, and have been hassling
various upstream carriers at different times, some of which have added services
quietly and not bothered to inform me. It sucks when people turn things into a
religious issue and go off on their high horses how everything should be done
perfectly.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
