On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:34:00 +1000, Roy Wallace <waldo000...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:15 AM, > Cameron<osm-mailing-li...@justcameron.com> wrote: >> I think tag the part of the way that is signed. Generally before bridges >> there is a sign informing road users of the bridge's restrictions. >> Sometimes >> they will offer an alternate route for larger vehicles. So tag from the >> nearest junction if available or the sign. > > Funnily enough, where I have been mapping the sign is always on the > bridge itself. Anyway, I think we should be tagging what the sign is > referring to, independent of the sign itself. > >> A clearance tag could just as easily be misinterpreted as the maxheight >> tag. > > I don't see how. "bridge=yes; clearance=2.8"... > > Roy > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk I am writing a proposal for a clearance-tag, I will send it out tomorrow. Link is posted from the tag-height discussion if you want to have a look at the draft -- Brgds Aun Johnsen via Webmail
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
