On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Roy Wallace wrote: > My main point is that when there is a "maximum height under a way", > this should be tagged as an attribute of that way, not of the ways > that pass under it.
Here I cannot agree When I travel over the bridge I am not interested in the maximum height of the way which travels under the bridge. When I travel under the bridge I am interested in the height limitation. Going back to my multipart specification, trying to really comprehend the logic the height of the arch is a property of the bridge. the max height which can go under the bridge is a property of the way / node beneath it note that counter-intuitively, height > max height > clearance _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
