Hi Peter,
I don't think anybody has a reason to object to merging them.  At
least me and User:Mala have been merging some of these nodes last week
and we got no blackmail so far :)  I believe we went through all the
country nodes which didn't have a name:pl= or name:it= assigned yet so
out of your list at most 15 or so countries should still remain
duplicated.

Cheers

On 02/08/2009, Peter Körner <osm-li...@mazdermind.de> wrote:
> Pieren schrieb:
>> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Peter Körner<pe...@mazdermind.de> wrote:
>>> I noticed that for some countries there seems to be more than one node.
>>> E.g. for Slovakia there are 5:
>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/424313572
>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/432425079
>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/424315420
>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/243851695
>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/424310798
>>>
>>> all at the same coordinate, most of them with the same names. Is this
>>> intended or just a mistake? Would it be ok to build a bot that correct
>>> this?
>>>
>>> Peter
>>
>> Read this:
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-July/038931.html
>>
>> It seems that one person is not able to revert all the crap he created.
>>
>> Pieren
>
> Ok, so here is an index of all duplicated countries:
> http://toolserver.org/~mazder/duplicate-countries/
>
> This is *not* the current state of osm, it's of 2009-07-05 which is the
> age of the postgis-database on cassini, the wikimedia osm-toolserver.
>
> It would be easy to extend the script generating this list, so that it
> merges those nodes into a single one. I just want to ask if that would
> be ok to everybody. If there is no contradiction until Monday, 10th
> August, I'll do so.
>
> Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to