Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> This can be applied to any way as long as that way needs to be used when >> passing the stile. The stile should be a node on that way, but whether >> it is the first/last node or any node inbetween doesn't matter at all. > > I see this differently as the restriction does not apply to the whole > footway but just to the part crossing the style. If the footway is > some kilometres in length, why would you want to map it as oneway for > all this part?
I wouldn't, I originally thought about adding something along the lines of "of course, that way shouldn't be kilometres long", but thought it was obvious anyway... In most situations reality will provide a way section with a length of a few meters whose only purpose is to go through the stile, so there will be a "natural" way to use for this. Otherwise, people will probably be intelligent enough to just split it. > IMHO you have to split the way after ~50cm after the > stile (width of the stile) and not to start before your inside the > stile (otherwise you will get "trapped" inside a normal footway (for > routers) not beeing able to return if e.g. the stile is closed. I don't think that this "trapping" situation is relevant in realistic cases (i.e. a few metres of way tagged like that) - it will even be below GPS accuracy. Tobias Knerr _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
