On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:06 PM, David Paleino<d.pale...@gmail.com> wrote: > There's no physical barrier, and the lanes are divided by continuous lines > -- that would be a no-changing-lanes restriction, but I'd still be > uncomfortable with drawing two separate ways -- that doesn't reflect real > world. > > Satellite image: > > http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=38.12436,13.355808&spn=0.001091,0.002411&t=k&z=19 > > (the street from NW is the one from S in my drawing -- > http://imagebin.ca/view/SjGkG4.html ) > > If you zoom in, you can clearly see the horizontal signals (at least at the NW > street, there's some shadow hiding those in the SW one). > > If there are no other suggestions, I'll try to think at something :/
You also referred to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_flow_intersection I don't remember ever seeing one of these in the wild. I don't think that the intersection that you are looking at is a continuous flow intersection as described in the wikipedia article. It appears to be a simple cross junction of two one way roads. Is that correct? If so I would map it with a single node at two crossing, one-way, ways. Here, in Ontario Canada, this junction would have no special signage, other than the one-way arrows (and do not enter, for the opposite). We have Right turn allowed on red light. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_turn_on_red This is abstracted locally to include left turn allowed on red when the junction is one-way to one-way. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
