Am 19.09.2009 14:39, Martin Koppenhoefer: > 2009/9/19 d f<fac63te...@yahoo.com>: >> Hi >> >> I have a bridge carrying a cycle lane, dual carriage way (with central >> reservtion)& footpath. As far as I can see is they each need there own >> bridge& the result gets a bit crowded. >> >> Is there a way to simplify this? >> If the bright was independent it could also mean that the ways wouldn't need >> to be split! Saving a hell of a lot of work. > > There is indeed a problem with bridges (in cases like yours it looks > like several bridges where in reality there is just one, then there > are bridge-names that can differ from the streetname, etc.), but what > do you intent by independant? Do you propose to connect all ways to > one bridge? > > I would recommend a relation to unify "several bridges" in one (which > gets also the name). Not really more simple to map, but resulting more > accurate and probably could also render nicer. > > cheers, > Martin
See this bridge/tunnel proposal for reference: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Bridges_and_Tunnels Claudius _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
