2009/9/19 John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com>: > 2009/9/19 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > >> I would recommend a relation to unify "several bridges" in one (which >> gets also the name). Not really more simple to map, but resulting more >> accurate and probably could also render nicer. > > That seems like such a nasty way to do it, this is why I've suggested > allowing us to tag lanes, not just ways so we don't need to do this > sort of hacks to tag the physical world.
don't get you. Isn't "mapping lanes" just the same like what I suggested? I'm in favour of mapping all lanes and ways as well, but you DO need relations to combine them into streets (indicating kind of separation and / or possibility to change lanes). I was in this case just talking about the bridge, but for streets I can imagine the same procedure (and add green, dividers, walls, curbs, etc. as well) cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
