2009/9/19 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > don't get you. Isn't "mapping lanes" just the same like what I > suggested? I'm in favour of mapping all lanes and ways as well, but > you DO need relations to combine them into streets (indicating kind of > separation and / or possibility to change lanes). I was in this case > just talking about the bridge, but for streets I can imagine the same > procedure (and add green, dividers, walls, curbs, etc. as well)
Why do we need relations to combine "lanes" into "ways". Wouldn't it make more sense to tag lanes of ways? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
