On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Apollinaris Schoell <ascho...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On 30 Sep 2009, at 20:46 , Russ Nelson wrote: >> > No, he is a leader because we respect him. THAT is how leaders in >> > an anarchic state arise. >> > >> >> yes he is a leader and as such deserves respect. he should lead some >> useful and intelligent projects and don't loose a word about this >> childish 1/0/yes/no/true/false discussions. >> a consumer of the data has to do a bit more work but this is a small >> fee for free access to an amazing database. >> > > The discussion is only childish if the tone of the discussion is childish. > But if people discuss this issue in a good manner, then it isn't childish. > > If we can remove that small fee, why not do it? > > What's so hard about standardizing on the boolean values given appropriate > changes to editor presets, good wiki documentation, and a deprecation period > for other boolean values?
what's so hard? The hard part is figuring out what the hell any of this actually has to do with the thread topic. Amazingly tag-standardisation is not even /relevant/ to the original problem pointed out. Oh well... wouldn't be the internet if someone wasn't wrong on it. Dave _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
