2009/10/3 Peteris Krisjanis <pec...@gmail.com>: > Actually more important question - why people which love mapping (and > I guess we all do, otherwise we wouldn't be here), are discussing such > simple things as BOOLEAN values in a midday of the Saturday? (ok, for > others it is probably very very early morning). I mean, COME ON, it is
Or the evening... > already governing practice to use "YES", or "NO". No, 0 or 1, or true However it's not explicitly written anywhere, which is what this is trying to achieve. > And yes, tagging needs comittee and needs seperate list. And it needs > "chain of decision command". Otherwise we spend time hitting dead > horses and not mapping. No point flogging a dead horse either :) > Sorry for a rant, but it seems very strange when people push freedom > of decision just a sake of freedom of decision. We don't try to push > our rules of driving on streets. We follow current rules and common > sense. Maybe let's try to do it also here. The problem is, there is as many perceptions of the world as there is people, and we're trying to generate a picture of the world by incorporating a small subset and to try and accomodate everyone at the same time and well something needs to be formalised some where. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk