On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > > On the other hand, putting the information directly on the way would > be problematic for many reasons. Ranges might span multiple ways, and > right/left has to be reversed whenever the way is reversed being the > most troublesome. > > this is enough reason to stay away from such a scheme. if it's too difficult no one will use it or they will break the data.
> It probably has to be a relation. Include a start node, an end node, > and a list of one or more ways (which are connected to form one > logical way). > > the ways have to be split at the start/end node. the relation members have to be ordered. too many beginners and medium experienced mappers have problems to understand such a scheme. how is that easier than the Karlsruhe scheme? > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > talk...@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk