On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Nop <ekkeh...@gmx.de> wrote: > >> So if consistency is the goal, you cannot rely on various personal >> opinions that exist only in people's minds and in email discussions >> from time to time (which no doubt only a small proportion of mappers >> ever read). You must write it down for reference. And if what's >> written down has flaws, they must be fixed. > > No help there. The major contractiory interpretations of the tags around > this topic are all "documented" in the wiki in contradictory ways. It just > depends on which page you find first and what conlusions you derive from > rather fuzzy definitions.
I know. I didn't mean to say the *content* of the wiki is necessarily good, just that I think the *concept* of the wiki is a better way to aim for consistency than throwing around personal opinions from time to time. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
