-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Frederik Ramm schreef: > Totally true, and actually a good argument for the PD case. Anyone who > takes OSM data and improves it privately is likely to to invest much > more in tracking OSM than it would cost him to just release his data > into OSM and save the effort.
But exactly the same goes for OSM. If there is a high quality source that updates lets say every 3 months. It will be more easy to destroy all changes than track them. Which is kinda... unwanted. Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREKAAYFAksdTdEACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn1PPACePujvfO1NlrBrBWsGWA3FcZJw dBAAnjkaPP6BrSUL9XmQPFFYJK9yqRXg =hMRZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
