On Dec 8, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Anthony wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:43 PM, SteveC <st...@asklater.com> wrote: > On Dec 8, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Anthony wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:22 PM, SteveC <st...@asklater.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 8, 2009, at 11:18 AM, Sebastian Hohmann wrote: > > > I don't know about that legal stuff in detail, but I agree that CC0 > > > would probably be the best licence. If OSM won't go and really try to > > > sue people, why protect the data? And why protect the data at all? > > > > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=bsd+vs+gpl&aq=f&oq=&aqi=g5 > > > > doesn't apply to Geodata. > > Because...? > > Same reason that CC-BY-SA doesn't apply to geodata. It mostly isn't > protected by copyright law.
What do you think TeleAtlas and NavTeq think about that? Have they been wasting their time all these years? Yours &c. Steve _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk