On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Steve Bennett <stevag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:47 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Or if he were really serious about this he'd come up with a suitable >> > > Was this mailing list always like this? I don't get it. I make a sincere > suggestion for a tag that I think would be useful, and just look at the > response. Where does it all come from? Someone smacks down the OP and two > others immediately chime in with "+1". Am I out of line brainstorming here? > Why the snide replies? Why so much negativity? > > Steve > Cool down Steve. The +1s were not to put you down, it was just agreement with something someone said. No one here is shooting down your proposal because they dont want change. Ask me, I am fed up of so many renderers, none of which renders everything that I want rendered. It is just that I dont see your solution as a scalable one and the same goes for many of the +1ers. The +1 is just a figure of speech. You are sort of advocating a top down approach while others think it has to be a bottom up approach. And all of us are entitled to our opinions. If you have a solution which can make the renderers render what they are supposed to render without adding layers of complicacy, it will be welcome. Cheers, Shalabh
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
