2010/1/3 Andy Allan <gravityst...@gmail.com>: > On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Dave F. <dave...@madasafish.com> wrote: > >> It needs to be one way or the other. >> Personally I think it _should_ be promoting map renderings, but on it's >> main map page it should be one that is truly open in the sense of OSM. > > This "sense of OSM" seems to have been redefined recently, to no > longer mean community-based-mapping nor open-licensed-geo-data but > instead something involving the software licences of whatever tool is > used to process the data. Did I miss the memo?
Every second person seems to have a different meaning for "Open"... This is why non-sense names are often better, after all are we still just mapping streets? :) _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk