On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Chris Hunter <chunter...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Last night, user NE2 "cleaned up" the interstate system by merging all of > the states with 2 relations per interstate back into 1 relation with > direction-based roles. I've already requested a roll-back on the area I was > working on, but I wanted to check if we still have a consensus on splitting > each interstate into separate directions at the state line.
What's more annoying is that he is changing the names/refs. From what I understand the ref is supposed to be only the interstate/highway number (e.g. "90" or "80") and not "I 90 (MN)". I use the ref on the relation when building maps for my Garmin to add highway shields to the map. -- Jeff Ollie _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
