On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, SteveC wrote: > > I realize most people have fallen asleep on this thread, but did anyone > > get a detailed report on why OSM was rejected? > > It's like Encyclopedia Britannica looking to move to Wikipedia in 2004 or > something, printing out a lot of books and getting experts to evaluate > empty and broken articles. > > What do you expect? > > Of course it's not perfect, but it is very, very good and it's getting > better all the time. Exponentially. And if you find a problem you can have > the freedom to fix it, together with the freedom to moan about it. >
There is also the second point of view about the failure of the Nav4All - that it relates to their business model, and no map data provider can fix their problem. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
