On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Jeff Spirko <spi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, all, > > Many of the administrative boundaries in my area follow roads (or vice > versa). (E.g. http://osm.org/go/Zcll6ubE?layers=B000TTF ) It seems > like the TIGER import has a separate list of nodes for the two ways > (one administrative and one road), but the nodes are at identical > locations. This makes Maplint and Potlatch complain about duplicated > nodes, making it hard to distinguish real map lint from this type. > > It seems like the TIGER data for the administrative boundaries is > pretty good, so I don't want to touch those nodes. > > What's the best thing to do with this situation: > 1. Leave it as-is. > 2. Combine the nodes so they're not duplicated. (Do bots sometimes > do this? How would a person do it in Potlatch?) > 3. Offset the nodes of the road so it follows the same line but no > longer forms map lint. > How about 4: delete the TIGER imported administrative boundaries? In my experience a) they're not very good, and b) we should be using boundary relations anyway.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
