* Roy Wallace <waldo000...@gmail.com> [2010-04-28 17:52 +1000]: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Phil! Gold <phi...@pobox.com> wrote: > >> Doesn't an "exit" exist independently of the sign? If so, is there a > >> way to map it independently of a destination_sign? > > > > It does, but I don't see any better relation for it > > What about similar to a turn_restriction relation? I.e. with a "from" > way, "via" node, and "to" way... > > You could use type=motorway_junction + ref=*, to be consistent with > the existing highway=motorway_junction tagging.
Like I said, I don't feel entirely up to the task of suggesting additions to OSM's tagging schemes yet, but that sounds like the best idea so far, in terms of appropriateness to the actual data. I guess I'll wait a few days and see if anyyone has any other suggestions. If not, I'll start reading about the tagging proposal process on the wiki. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- Time is nature's way of making sure that everything doesn't happen at once. Space is nature's way of making sure that everything doesn't happen to you. ---- --- -- _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
