On 14 May 2010 09:24, Roy Wallace <waldo000...@gmail.com> wrote: > Does McDonalds have a burger in their logo? > Does Nike have a shoe in their logo? > Does IBM have a computer in their logo?
Logos of 2 out of the 3 listed above have something to do with the business name, even if it isn't to do with products they sell, also IBM did punch card machines before they did mainframes, although these days they make most of their money from services, not sales of hardware. Logos and branding can go one of two ways, a non-identifiable name like google that doesn't mean anything related to the product they sell, or OpenStreetMap and which is related to the product. > IMHO the only good thing about the current logo is that it is the current > logo. While it might not scale down for things like site icons, I actually don't mind the current logo, it incorporates the fact that there is bits behind the rendering... _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
