On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Gustav Foseid <gust...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org>wrote: > >> Something that is available from an official online source but not >> verifiable on the ground should not - in my personal opinion - be >> included in OSM. >> > > No borders? No national parks? No nature reserves? No voltage on power > lines? No named farms (unless the owner puts up a sign)? No names for peaks? > > Except for borders, all of those things are verifiable on the ground. I think that is Frederik's point.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk