On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Gustav Foseid <gust...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org>wrote:
>
>> Something that is available from an official online source but not
>> verifiable on the ground should not - in my personal opinion - be
>> included in OSM.
>>
>
> No borders? No national parks? No nature reserves? No voltage on power
> lines? No named farms (unless the owner puts up a sign)? No names for peaks?
>
>
Except for borders, all of those things are verifiable on the ground. I
think that is Frederik's point.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to