>> I never said they didn't agree to the ODBL, but that the new CTs, >> specifically section 3, wasn't going to be compatible, even if ODBL >> is. > > Only if a later license change were to go non-SA. An hypothetical > situation that you have created. >
I know you like to have personal flame war, but in nutshell ODBL is share alike, so no problems here. I have two questions though: 1) Why we need CT in first place 2) What section 3 is about Cheers, Peter. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
