On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Jaak Laineste <jaak.laine...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Map is a hand-written 2D picture of the world. It is definitely more a
> > kind of art than a digital photo in flickr, there is more subjectivity
> > and intelligence etc needed to make it.
> >
> > How can photos be copyrighted? Aren't photos just visual registrations
> > of facts? Also there are many artistic paintings, books, movies etc,
> > which try to be "purely factual", at least through the eyes of the
> > author?
> >
> > I don't really see how someone can even have the idea (or argument)
> > that map is just a database of facts.
> >
> >  I'd suggest a simple technical test for "is X an art or fact".
> > 1. ask two persons to create the X.
> > 2. store it to a digital file, and make diff of the files.
> >
> > Only if you can get "no differences" then this was a pure fact. I am
> > sure that mapping (like e.g. photography) will fail the test, even
> > without trying it out.
>
> Agreed.  That's basically the merger doctrine.  Of course, the problem
> with that here in the United States is Feist, and especially the lower
> court cases which attempted to follow Feist.
>
> I asked before why isn't OSM copyrightable when maps are
> copyrightable.  And after some research I think I found the answer.
> Under a certain line of reasoning following Feist, maps *aren't*
> copyrightable, at least not to any significant extent.  See ADC v.
> Franklin Maps.
>
> Which doesn't make a whole lot of sense.  Maps are one of the original
> works for which copyright was designed.  Not sure what's next.  Maybe
> software.  Eventually only abstract art will be copyrighted ;).
>
>
If you march your way down Wikipedia's list of US copyright case law [0],
you'll notice that specific expansion of copyright was made for things like
photographs, "applied art", and computer software.

[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_copyright_case_law#United_States
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to