80n <80n80n <at> gmail.com> writes: >It's inevitable that there will be at least one fork of OSM content if the >license is switched to ODbL + CT.
Just to be clear: there is a big 'if' in the above assertion. I don't think it is inevitable that OSM will split into multiple projects, because I don't think it inevitable that ODbL+CT will be imposed in their current proposed form by the OSMF. What 80n wrote is correct, but it's not quite as bleak as it sounds. -- Ed Avis <e...@waniasset.com> _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
