2010/10/25 Dave F. <dave...@madasafish.com>: > On 25/10/2010 10:38, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> >> 2010/10/25 Dave F.<dave...@madasafish.com>: >>> >>> On 25/10/2010 10:17, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: >>>> >>>> what about tourism=information with it's several subtags? Seems to fit >>>> perfectly IMHO as a primary tag. >>> >>> building=tourist_information >> >> no, please not. the building key is (and should IMHO be) used for >> typology, you are trying to miss-use it to map a function. > > Please give an example to explain what you mean, because to me, > building=tourist_information is a typology.
it is a function, not a building type. A building type would be tower, semi detached house, condominium, flat, basilica, etc. For a more extensive list have a look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_building_types (I didn't check this for errors) > How about > > building=yes > building:use=tourist_information why attach information about the use under information about the building? IMHO the two should be kept separate as we did in the past. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
