Simon Poole wrote:
> That however does require the importer/mapper to raise the 
> issue to a level where that support exists. As the LWG has 
> pointed out, that hasn't worked in the past, and there is IMHO 
> no reason to believe that it will magically start working in the 
> future.

Oh, sure, nothing "magically starts working". It requires willingness and
commitment to make it work, just like everything else in OSM. I'm willing to
put effort into licence compatibility (and have made suggestions to LWG,
which they've taken up, to ensure CT compatibility with attribution-required
licences). Are you?

Richard


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/New-phrase-in-section-2-tp5793972p5815086.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Reply via email to