Just a comment locally someone did a trace and managed to get one end of the
road about 100 meters out and connected at the wrong road junction.  Took me
a while to sort it out.

Cheerio John

On 19 December 2010 19:18, <j...@jfeldredge.com> wrote:

> OK, but there will likely be additional details available from visiting the
> site in person that you wouldn't be able to detect from an aerial view, plus
> you would be able to tell if the road had been modified since the aerial
> photo had been taken.
>
> -------Original Email-------
> Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] Bing maps is misplaced
> From  :mailto:sea...@gmail.com
> Date  :Sun Dec 19 18:00:21 America/Chicago 2010
>
>
> For *that* particular imagery, yes.
>
> My point is that blindly saying that you shouldn't trace from imagery
> if you haven't visited the place is not a hard rule. There are a lot
> of circumstances when tracing is actually OK.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:19 AM, John F. Eldredge <j...@jfeldredge.com>
> wrote:
> > So, you are saying that you feel OpenStreetMap should reflect the status
> of the road when the aerial photo was made, rather than the current status?
> >
> > -------Original Email-------
> > Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] Bing maps is misplaced
> > From  :mailto:sea...@gmail.com
> > Date  :Sun Dec 19 10:17:51 America/Chicago 2010
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:04 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> > <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 2010/12/15 Steve Bennett <stevag...@gmail.com>:
> >>> I'm sorry, but no. This is not common practice, nor is it desirable.
> >>> Could we please not give advice which only reflects personal
> >>> preferences?
> >>>
> >>> Fwiw, highway=road is for when you know *nothing* about a road. Can
> >>> you tell me, hand on heart, that you would not tag this road:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.nearmap.com/?ll=-38.107325,145.15275&z=20&t=k&nmd=20101020
> >>>
> >>> as highway=residential, maxspeed=50, surface=paved, lanes=2?
> >>
> >>
> >> If I knew the road I would surely do it. For the_point_ you linked
> >> to, it seems correct (the maxspeed at least for one direction), but I
> >> still would have to guess, that this maxspeed is valid for the other
> >> direction as well (probably yes, but you cannot be sure) and that it
> >> is valid for the whole road.
> >
> > If I was a tourist and I went to that particular spot and saw that
> > "50" on the ground, I still wouldn't know if the speed limit is just
> > for one direction or both and if it applies to the whole road. So even
> > if I were on the ground, my information would not be much better than
> > if I traced from that particular aerial imagery.
> >
> >> Don't know if it is a residential street either (could be unclassified
> >> or tertiary). Of course you don't know for other restrictions (e.g.
> >> weight, but also access=destination, ...). You can be quite sure for
> >> the information you provided above, but still you don't know if some
> >> important information (like access=destination) that you surely would
> >> insert if you had visited the place, is missing.
> >
> > OSM's a wiki, so other people can add those details. There's no need
> > to have everything topnotch on the first edit. Otherwise we'd have a
> > pretty blank map.
> >
> >> This discussion is simply about the quality level: are you satisfied
> >> with probable information derived from an aerial photo depicting the
> >> situation some years ago, or do you want to insert only information
> >> you verified on the ground and you can guarantee for?
> >
> > For aerial imagery that is of a high resolution and recency as
> > Nearmap's, I would rather trust an Australian to trace and add data
> > from that imagery even if he/she has not been to the place than if I
> > were to actually visit that place and add details from on the ground.
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> > talk mailing list
> > talk@openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> >
> > --
> > John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
> > "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than
> not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria
> >_______________________________________________
> > talk mailing list
> > talk@openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
>
> --
> John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
> "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly
> is better than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to