Matt Amos wrote:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Lester Caine<les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote:
> The original decision that there should be no duplicate nodes simply ignored
> many of the arguments that there are very good reasons for needing them,
> then tools like the duplicate nodes map ASSUME that the decision takes
> priority rather than allowing 'duplicates' which are distinguished due to
> their elevation?
the duplicate nodes map doesn't assume that all duplicates are errors
(http://matt.dev.openstreetmap.org/dupe_nodes/about.html#errors). it's
simply a tool for finding them - because most of them are errors, -
and it's nice to have tools which help in fixing them. as Tom points
out, it seems that some are simply a little too zealous in fixing
them, maybe relying too heavily on the auto-fix feature in JOSM's
validator, and should be looking at the data more thoroughly.
Sorry was not 'blaming' duplicate nodes map directly. Unless that is it DOES
highlight nodes which are at different elevations? In which case it should
simply not be highlighting them in the first place? Then people would not be
'trying to correct them' ... If nodes have a different elevation then they
perhaps should be identified differently if they need to be highlighted?
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
