On 1 February 2011 20:31, Tobias Knerr <o...@tobias-knerr.de> wrote: > It is a very interesting statement, though. It is not, as you imply, a > reason for not agreeing to the Contributor Terms (these would still > allow us to go for CC 4.0 licenses), but I hope that the Foundation > keeps this development on the radar. >
The Licensing Working Group has been speaking to Creative Commons. The minutes from last week: ---- 4. Creative Commons Mike Linksvayer, Vice President, and General Counsel Diane Peters of Creative Commons joined us to discuss where they at with BY-SA and data. We were greaty encouraged that they will be looking at this very seriously during a CC suite 4.0 version review process, which will take about two years once started. Mike L particularly emphasised the importance of inter-operability. The meeting was very cordial and both groups look forward to mutual co-operation. Mike said that OpenStreetMap is very happy to share our experience as a pioneer in trying to implement an Open IP license for data and databases that incorporated attribution and share-alike and looked forward to participating in the CC 4.0 input process. He also asked if Creative Commons could consider whether it could make any public comments on the issue of compatibility with current CC-BY licenses on data and the ODbL. Ended 20:00. Steve, Diane and Mike L left the call." ---- Source: https://docs.google.com/a/firefishy.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_101d2sqnzfg Regards Grant _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
