On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Matt Williams <li...@milliams.com> wrote: > On 9 February 2011 18:43, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Joseph Reeves <iknowjos...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> But that's got nothing to do with the licensing change - that's an >>> issue of you ripping off Google Maps. >> >> It has nothing at all to do with me ripping off Google Maps. And >> regardless of the *reason* the contributions are deleted, the *impact* >> is going to be the same. >> >> Bottom line, due to the board's utter lack of comprehension with >> regard to copyright law, they have deemed it necessary to decimate the >> map. That's true of the ODbL switch, and that's true of the deletion >> of my contributions. >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.0748&lon=-82.5394&zoom=14&layers=M > > So what I think we should all do is roll up our sleeves and just remap > this area from the usual sources (aerial imagery if necessary) and it > will be back to normal before long.
I agree. Hopefully you can make it even better than it was before. I'd definitely appreciate it. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
