On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:49:58 +0000, Dave F. wrote:
On 09/02/2011 11:53, ant wrote:
What you do mean by "inaccurate readings"? I think the map is quite
accurate.
http://ant.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=51.06122731915702&lon=-2.3915486787965934&zoom=9
The blank areas have hi-res imagery (caveat: I have checked every
tile)
Apart from checking every tile, it is only an assumption. A fair
assumption, but still just an assumption. As long as you haven't checked
all tiles it is entirely possible that there is an area of low-res
imagery contained in that area.
Furthermore: you know nothing of the level of hi-res imagery. Is it
"high" res imagery, "very high", "ultra high" or "super high"?
BTW: isn't there a possibility to make an offline renderer for this?
This would speed the process up even more.
Regards,
Maarten
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
