Peter Budny wrote: > > I really don't mind whether it's route relations or ref tags. The > problem is that NEITHER is finished. To get to my house, I have to get > on State Route 1966, then 1267. Neither of these are marked as such on > the map, and I'm certainly not going to do it by hand when I could write > a tool that will fix those AND all the rest of the U.S. at the same > time. > The big problem with your proposal to auto-generate relations from the TIGER tags is that, while TIGER in many/most areas is pretty good for alignment and street names, it's pretty horrible for routings of numbered routes in built-up areas and with being up-to-date on route changes. I suggest going county-by-county through the official listings at http://transportation.ky.gov/planning/reports/SPRS_listings/SPRS_listings.asp and marking ref tags on each by hand (rather simple after downloading a xapi query into JOSM), with FIXME tags where the routing is unclear. Then you can auto-generate relations from the ref tags. (Just remember that some routes, I think those numbered 6000+, are not signed.) -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Zero-tolerance-on-imports-tp6044534p6050032.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
