On Tuesday 14 June 2011 19:28:52 Pieren wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net>wrote: > > Just as a factual point: > > > > The Contributor Terms were posted to the mailing lists in September 2009 > > as far as I can see: > > > > > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2009-September/002803 > >.html > > > > The concept appears to have been proposed in June 2009: > > > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2009-June/002528.html > > Both on the confidential legal-talk list ... This is a perfect example of a > process that never involved the average contributors. > > Pieren
I am not and never was subscribed to the legal-talk list. Neverless I was well aware of the existence of the the CT's _before_ the OSMF vote. If one voted in the OSMF vote or even formed an opinion about it at that time without reading the two pro and contra wiki-pages mentioned in the announcement [1], then that is ones own fault, not of the vote, some process or anything else. -- m.v.g., Cartinus [1] <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Open_Data_License/OSMF_Members_Vote/Why_You_Should_Vote_No&oldid=386593> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Open_Data_License/OSMF_Members_Vote/Why_You_Should_Vote_Yes&oldid=386630> _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
