Tim Chris is trying to gently point out to you, as I was, that you're the one who's sucked up the most LWG time lately and thus making your suggestions on how they sound their time is a bit odd.
Ignoring the point isn't helping. Steve stevecoast.com On Jun 20, 2011, at 10:25, TimSC <mappingli...@sheerman-chase.org.uk> wrote: > On 20/06/11 18:11, Chris Hill wrote: >> >>> It seems to me the same issues come up again and again, but never >>> concluded, so it is not necessarily the fault of the person asking the >>> question (or even of the LWG). I suggest that people directly trying to >>> communicate with the LWG is a symptom and not a cause of the communication >>> problem. >>> >> >> And exactly how did making a long list of personal demands at the eleventh >> hour help with that process? > > Ok, just sanity check here - I looked at subject line as to what we are > talking about - which is communication difficulties and LWG and related > issues. Part of the problem in OSM mailing lists is that discussions keep > going off topic and this is even directly after I raised it as a problem. > Given that is a significant problem, the question is how do we address it? > > I suggest list moderation (which is community lead, not by a dictator) and a > high standard of behavior set by the community leaders. (Yes, admittedly > moderation takes volunteers but we need to agree on a plan before > implementing it.) Can anyone think of a better plan? > > Regards, > > TimSC > > PS I plan to disregard, as much as I can, all non-constructive input. I will > probably only be partly successful though. > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
