* Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> [2011-08-26 15:33 +0200]: > I think it is only logical to group all ways making up the border > with country A in one relation, and those making up the border with > country B in another, and so on.
Why is this so logical? The exact same data can be derived from the intersection of the sets of elements in the two countries' (single-level) border relations. It seems to me that because both shcmes can satisfy the use case, the preferable approace would be the simpler one, which I see as being the single-relation approach. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- Serious error. All shortcuts have disappeared, Screen. Mind. Both are blank. ---- --- -- _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
