For way 3256123 (the anti-clockwise carriageway of the M25), Potlatch doesn't seem to highlight it when the 'Show licence status' option is enabled. http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.322365&lon=-0.45067&zoom=18&layers=M
It was created by a non-agreer, so shouldn't it be highlighted? It is a member of a relation (which therefore means it has 'relation' highlighting, but shouldn't the licence highlighting be displayed 'on top' of that (I think I have seen that in other cases, but maybe I'm imagining that)? It is highlighted in the OpenStreetMap Inspector view: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=wtfe&lon=-0.45038&lat=51.32242&zoom=18&overlays=overview,wtfe_point_clean,wtfe_line_clean,wtfe_point_modified,wtfe_line_modified_cp,wtfe_line_modified,wtfe_point_created,wtfe_line_created_cp,wtfe_line_created wtfe returns "Undecided": http://wtfe.gryph.de/api/0.6/problems?ways=3256123 There are still some nodes remaining from the original user, so I would also have expected those nodes to be highlighted, but they aren't: http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=3256123 Any ideas? Maybe my understanding of how the highlighting should work is mistaken? -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Potlatch-licence-status-highlighting-wrong-tp7199815p7199815.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
