This is going to require some analysis, but I believe all of the decliners were tracing from satellite imagery. So the specific tags added would have been detailed information about those objects.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Paul Norman <penor...@mac.com> wrote: > If it wasn't you surveying it, you'd have to verify that nothing remained of > the decliners contributions. Just because someone surveyed something doesn't > mean that they surveyed all the v1 data (for an example where v1 was from a > decliner) > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kate Chapman [mailto:k...@maploser.com] >> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 5:18 PM >> To: Michael Collinson >> Cc: hot; OSM Talk >> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] odbl non-agreement and humanitarian exceptions. >> >> Much of this data has already been ground surveyed. Would it be >> possible based on the source tags to mark things odbl=clean? >> >> I think that would take care of a large majority of the problem, since >> there has been so much on the ground work since the earthquake. >> >> -Kate >> >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Michael Collinson <m...@ayeltd.biz> >> wrote: >> > On 02/02/2012 16:23, Larry O'Neill wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi All, >> >> >> >> Apologies for any overlap in recipients for this - I very rarely post >> >> to mailing lists, so I am not sure how wide a net for this issue >> >> would be appropriate. >> >> >> >> There was a discussion on the #osm irc channel recently about the >> >> possibility of approaching non-agreers to the new CT about any data >> >> they may have contributed to areas where the removal of such data >> >> could have a negative effect on our humanitarian efforts. >> >> Looking for example at how much data we stand to lose in Haiti, this >> >> is something that may limit the difficulty of those that are on the >> >> ground in these places and struggling to remap. >> >> >> >> The possibility of haing a bounding box around areas such as these >> >> was mentioned - and there is aparantly a precedent for a users data >> >> within a BB being retained. >> >> >> >> Any thoughts, comments, or points? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Larry O'Neill >> > >> > >> > Hi Larry, >> > >> > It looks as though there are no specific licensing issues as regards >> > base data/photos used in Haiti [1]. The issue appears to be confined >> > to mappers who have been active in the area but have either declined >> > or not yet responded to requests to re-license? [2] >> > >> > We will need their individual permissions, the simplest way being just >> > to ask them to respond to the new terms. Friendly, courteous messages >> > coming from individual mappers working in the same area have been >> > highly effective in a number of countries. I would expect it to be >> > doubly so here. We can then revisit the issue in say, two weeks time >> and see if anyone is left. >> > >> > I am immediately going to ask for a Haiti/Dominican Republic link to >> > be added to http://odbl.de/ and http://odbl.poole.ch/ Then you can >> > just read off the names and status. >> > >> > Meanwhile, you can use the OSMI License View tool to get started. Here >> > is an incomplete list I just grabbed using it: >> > >> > Exponent, Brent Miller, cetest, osmapb1, Tinono, rendle, Tinono, >> > EvaStern, robbert, Sidneyleenen, Elle_M, DDDarek, veugelke, Mirko >> > Küster, Eddy Frometa, Alfredo Gil, Jochen Plumeyer, llibre >> > >> > It is good know their status. You can do that by feeding them into >> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/xxxx or seeing if they are on >> > >> > http://odbl.poole.ch/central-america-20111208-20120201-poly.html >> > >> > This wiki page can be used to coordinate efforts: >> > >> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Asking_users_to_accept_the_ODbL >> > >> > Please do not hesitate to coordinate with us at >> > le...@osmfoundation.org . We will do our best to assist. >> > >> > Mike >> > License Working Group >> > >> > [1]. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue (Appears to >> > be only Digital Orthophotos) >> > >> > [2] >> > http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=wtfe&lon=-71.35913&lat=18.22309&z >> > oom=7&opacity=0.69&overlays=overview,wtfe_point_clean,wtfe_line_clean, >> > wtfe_point_harmless,wtfe_line_harmless,wtfe_point_modified,wtfe_line_m >> > odified_cp,wtfe_line_modified,wtfe_point_created,wtfe_line_created_cp, >> > wtfe_line_created >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > talk mailing list >> > talk@openstreetmap.org >> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk