On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 03:56, Russ Nelson <nel...@crynwr.com> wrote: > David Earl writes: > > It would help to know that email is bouncing. > > We should put out a press release stating that if anyone values their > copyright so little that they have not maintained a working email > address, their copyright interest will be transferred to the OSMF > (yes, I realize, creator's rights & all that). > > If they don't like that, they are welcome to update their email > address. If they don't care, why should we?
+1000 ! If they dont care anything anymore about the project, why bother in the first place? They might be unwillingly not relicencing their work. They might, if they knew. i.e. recently I was looking at the list of not yet CT agreeing people, I found someone I knew in real life, called him on the phone, and him why he wasn't agreeing on the new terms: his answer: I saw the emails, but I thought it was somethign not important, and I discarded them. see my point? Our default action should be: if somebody doesn't answer, then relicence.... -- -S _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
