I was under the impression that OSM is riddled with data that is not .odbl compliant. In some of my personal mapping my sources may not have been fully personal observation which is more or less what I understand .odbl requirements to be which is why I requested my contributions be deleted since I couldn't remember absolutely which were which. My more recent updates are .odbl compliant.
The CANVEC imports I did could be quickly redone. In fact I note that some bright spark has been reimporting CANVEC 7 information over CANVEC 6 so suddenly there are lots of duplicates that the bots don't pick up because the source is different. Cheerio John On 28 May 2012 15:53, Richard Weait <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 3:42 PM, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert > Gremmen <[email protected]> wrote: > [ ... ] > > However, it was not meant that the data were simply to be copied, > deleted > > and re-pasted into the map using a fake account. > > True. Copy / pasting is not the same as remapping from permitted sources. > > Could you provide a link or ID to one of the nodes, ways or relations > that concern you? > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
