I thank Maurizio for his precise answer. I quote it completely. And thanks also for sharing Hatcher's schema. Very clear. If you like to deepen the "open database licensing" topic, you can also read my article: - Italian version: Open licensing e banche dati (Informatica e diritto, n. 1-2/2011); - English version: Open licensing and databases (International Free and Open Source Software Law Review, Vol 4, No 2, 2011) [The article is under a CC by-sa license] Thanks, bye. -- Simone Aliprandi - http://www.aliprandi.org
2012/9/3 Maurizio Napolitano <napoo...@gmail.com>: > If you read the opendefinition > > “A piece of content or data is open if anyone is free to use, reuse, > and redistribute it — subject only, at most, to the requirement to > attribute and/or share-alike.” > > (here more details - http://opendefinition.org/okd/) > > you can understand that the CC-NC, CC-ND and the mix of this aren't > open license. > these are public licenses > Jordan Hatcher - the main author of the ODbL and the project Open Data > Commons - > made this schema > > http://www.jordanhatcher.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Open_v_Public_licenses_Venn.002-001.png _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
