(sorry, I forgot the links) - Italian version: Open licensing e banche dati (Informatica e diritto, n. 1-2/2011) -> http://www.aliprandi.org/pub/aliprandi_ied_database.pdf - English version: Open licensing and databases (International Free and Open Source Software Law Review, Vol 4, No 2, 2011) -> http://www.ifosslr.org/ifosslr/article/view/62
2012/9/3 Simone Aliprandi <simone.alipra...@gmail.com>: > I thank Maurizio for his precise answer. I quote it completely. > And thanks also for sharing Hatcher's schema. Very clear. > If you like to deepen the "open database licensing" topic, you can > also read my article: > - Italian version: Open licensing e banche dati (Informatica e > diritto, n. 1-2/2011); > - English version: Open licensing and databases (International Free > and Open Source Software Law Review, Vol 4, No 2, 2011) > [The article is under a CC by-sa license] > Thanks, bye. > -- > Simone Aliprandi - http://www.aliprandi.org > > 2012/9/3 Maurizio Napolitano <napoo...@gmail.com>: >> If you read the opendefinition >> >> “A piece of content or data is open if anyone is free to use, reuse, >> and redistribute it — subject only, at most, to the requirement to >> attribute and/or share-alike.” >> >> (here more details - http://opendefinition.org/okd/) >> >> you can understand that the CC-NC, CC-ND and the mix of this aren't >> open license. >> these are public licenses >> Jordan Hatcher - the main author of the ODbL and the project Open Data >> Commons - >> made this schema >> >> http://www.jordanhatcher.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Open_v_Public_licenses_Venn.002-001.png -- Simone Aliprandi - http://www.aliprandi.org _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
