On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote: > Many of the buildings moving away from the one identified simply do not even > fit the footprint on the bing imagery and many of the 'divisions' seem to > follow the ridge of a building rather than a difference between roof colour. > The current blocks simply make no sense! It is not possible from the aerial > imagery to identify divisions so unless those divisions are identified by > other means ...
Lester, these building data are coming from permits sent by architects to the tax administration. It is not based on aerial imagery. Pieren _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk