On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote:
> Many of the buildings moving away from the one identified simply do not even
> fit the footprint on the bing imagery and many of the 'divisions' seem to
> follow the ridge of a building rather than a difference between roof colour.
> The current blocks simply make no sense! It is not possible from the aerial
> imagery to identify divisions so unless those divisions are identified by
> other means ...

Lester, these building data are coming from permits sent by architects
to the tax administration. It is not based on aerial imagery.

Pieren

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to