On 2012-10-10 22:22, Richard Weait wrote:
What are the results?
Some respondents mentioned that close-but-not-touching ways made for
a
"bad mapper" but were generally very understanding on this point. It
was seen more as an indication of inexperience.
The Big Pet Peeve that identified bad mappers was "poor or missing
comments."
I've taken a go at graphing comment quality. This is not science of
course. Try it yourself; how would you measure comment quality?
http://imgur.com/ibK76
The question is: how do _you_ measure comment quality? These numbers
say nothing to me. You must have some formula to convert a comment to a
quality.
The most common comment quality is 18.
Half of all accounts have comment quality from 13 to 36.
Bots usually have comment quality under one.
Many of the named bad mappers have comment quality under 6. Given
the
number of mappers who specifically mentioned comment quality, should
not be a surprise.
So high = good quality? Even that was not clear.
Regards,
Maarten
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
