> From: Jason Remillard [mailto:remillard.ja...@gmail.com] > Subject: [OSM-talk] additional layers on osm.org > > Hello Everybody, > > I wanted to confirm the major reason we only have 4 layers on osm.org, > is a resourcing issue, rather than a political issue. Basically, we do > not have enough disk, cpu, bandwidth, and people to host them in the UK.
The only layer which uses OSMF resources is the layer labeled "Standard", also known as osm.org mapnik. Given that others[1] are successfully providing a wide variety of layers, it doesn't seem like devoting OSMF resources to another worldwide non-debug layer is necessary. > So assuming: we can host them on the US OSM servers, the servers can > handle it, and the map quality is good, etc, etc. Would there be any > problem adding the following map layers to osm.org? I don't think these concerns should impact if it goes on osm.org, but a world-wide tile layer can take substantial resources, and is this what local chapter wants to be doing? [1] e.g. http://mapstyle.petschge.de/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
