On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:30:58 Vladimir Vyskocil wrote: > > That's how it is I'm afraid, and that is a good example. I'd suggest > > that node needs an additional tag - junction=yes - as described in the > > wiki to make it very clear. It should also be merged with the node at > > the intersection of the two ways that actually form the crossroads. > > But how to deal with complex crossroads where there's not a single point of > junction, but many (oneway or not) lanes crossing at different points ? A > relation with type=junction referencing all the crossing points and > carrying the name of the whole crossroad ?
Maybe that would work. We do need that in Korea, as there are many dual-carriageways crossing other dual-carriageways with slipways between them. Drivers using any road would need to see the name of the approaching junction, but it's the same name. Right now I think each junction node is just tagged with the same information. I can raise the issue on the talk-ko list to get more input, but really, a simple and obvious solution like this could be used right away. Best wishes, Andrew _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
