On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 11:08:01PM +0200, andrzej zaborowski wrote: > On 3 May 2013 22:58, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > > On 03.05.2013 22:12, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > >> The consensus was that--at least for place relations which are the > >> target of the said property--OSM relation IDs are stable enough and any > >> changes in IDs can be easily rectified. Wikidata is a wiki after all. > > > > I am less concerned about the Wikidata side - if they make a bad judgement > > then it is their mess to clean up. I am however concerned that if more > > people simply assume that the status quo is there to stay ("IDs are stable > > enough"), this will put pressure on *us* and limit our flexibility in the > > future. > > The OSMF has sent a pretty strong message saying that object IDs are > stable enough to base impactful legal decisions on them. It will look > silly for them to go back to the stance that IDs aren't stable after > all.
What are you talking about? Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-721-388298 _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk